Author summary
⁠6%1 analyzed article/video261 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ron Eland Boulder City Review results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 297 faulty-reasoning hits from 783 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (1,756 of 6,368 authors). This Ron Eland Boulder City Review is worse (more manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Ron Eland Boulder City Review
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠73%Ron Eland Boulder City Review (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 783
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Ron Eland Boulder City Review attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Ron Eland Boulder City Review vs sitewide
Ron Eland Boulder City Review attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos