Author summary
8%1 analyzed article/video2,241 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert T.F. Downes results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 409 hits. Analysis detected 2,453 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 3% (8,269 of 8,529 authors). This Robert T.F. Downes is better (less manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group.
Robert T.F. Downes
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
3%Robert T.F. Downes (selected)1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,964
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

3% percentile
02550751003.0% percentile
0.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos