Author summary
⁠13%1 analyzed article/video1,982 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Weiner results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 451 hits. Analysis detected 2,327 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,946 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (6,168 of 6,614 authors). This Rachel Weiner is better (less manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group.
Rachel Weiner
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠7%Rachel Weiner (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,946
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Rachel Weiner attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Rachel Weiner vs sitewide
Rachel Weiner attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos