Author summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video635 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Osier Lindley results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 308 hits. Analysis detected 1,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,905 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (1,543 of 5,453 authors). This Rachel Osier Lindley is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
Rachel Osier Lindley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠72%Rachel Osier Lindley (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,905
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Rachel Osier Lindley attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Rachel Osier Lindley vs sitewide
Rachel Osier Lindley attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos