Author summary
70%1 analyzed article/video635 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KERA results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 308 hits. Analysis detected 1,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,905 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,542 of 5,453 authors). This KERA is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
KERA
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
1%Joe Rennison1%
72%KERA (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,905
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
KERA attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
KERA vs sitewide
KERA attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos