Author summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video182 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pricila Flores results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 84 faulty-reasoning hits from 728 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (5,309 of 8,669 authors). This Pricila Flores is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Pricila Flores
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠39%Pricila Flores (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 728
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles728 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.0%3.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 2.6%2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos