Author summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video770 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Schorsch results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 524 hits. Analysis detected 3,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,310 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (1,111 of 6,580 authors). This Peter Schorsch is worse (more manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
Peter Schorsch
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠84%Peter Schorsch (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,310
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Peter Schorsch attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Peter Schorsch vs sitewide
Peter Schorsch attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos