Author summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pandora Dewan results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 247 hits. Analysis detected 1,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,505 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (2,996 of 6,278 authors). This Pandora Dewan is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Pandora Dewan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠53%Pandora Dewan (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,505
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Pandora Dewan attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Pandora Dewan vs sitewide
Pandora Dewan attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos