Author summary
⁠4%1 analyzed article/video442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nona Tepper results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 146 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,326 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (4,640 of 9,216 authors). This Nona Tepper is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Nona Tepper
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠50%Nona Tepper (selected)3%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,326
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.5%2.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos