Author summary
ā 81%1 analyzed article/video940 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nina Thorsen results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 332 hits. Analysis detected 2,219 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ā 63% (2,032 of 5,400 authors). This Nina Thorsen is worse (more manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Nina Thorsen
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Vivek Chibber1%
ā 0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
ā 0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
ā 1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
ā 1%Joe Rennison1%
ā 63%Nina Thorsen (selected)4%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,820
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nina Thorsen attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nina Thorsen vs sitewide
Nina Thorsen attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos