Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nina Raemont results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 2.4% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 658 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,431 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 4,886 authors). This Nina Raemont is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nina Raemont
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠100%Daniel Arkin38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Nina Raemont (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 4,431
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nina Raemont attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nina Raemont vs sitewide
Nina Raemont attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos