Author summary
64%1 analyzed article/video966 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Stoico results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 288 hits. Analysis detected 2,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,898 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,152 of 5,296 authors). This Nick Stoico is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Nick Stoico
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nick Stoico attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nick Stoico vs sitewide
Nick Stoico attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.