Author summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video966 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Camilo Fonseca results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 288 hits. Analysis detected 2,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,898 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (2,151 of 5,296 authors). This Camilo Fonseca is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Camilo Fonseca
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠60%Camilo Fonseca (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,898
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Camilo Fonseca attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Camilo Fonseca vs sitewide
Camilo Fonseca attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos