Author summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video109 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neil Lancefield results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 296 faulty-reasoning hits from 436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (680 of 8,318 authors). This Neil Lancefield is worse (more manipulative) than 91.80% of the peer group.
Neil Lancefield
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠92%Neil Lancefield (selected)7%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 436
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Neil Lancefield attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Neil Lancefield vs sitewide
Neil Lancefield attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos