Author summary
⁠17%1 analyzed article/video505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Orenstein results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Bandwagon, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 921 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (3,832 of 5,039 authors). This Natalie Orenstein is better (less manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Natalie Orenstein
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠24%Natalie Orenstein (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,020
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Natalie Orenstein attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Natalie Orenstein vs sitewide
Natalie Orenstein attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos