Foreclosure tax will appear on Oakland’s November ballot 5%
By Natalie Orenstein0%
7/9/2026, 10:00:00 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 217 faulty-reasoning hits from 505 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 20.6% and a BS Rank of 5% (15,134 of 15,904 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.20% of the article peer group.
Voters will decide in November whether to tax big banks and investors that foreclose on Oakland properties.
This is not a new tax, exactly.
Oakland’s real estate transfer tax already applies to buyers and sellers of homes and buildings in the city.
But foreclosures and similar transactions are currently exempt.
Extending the tax to corporations that seize homes “closes a loophole,” said Councilmember Charlene Wang at Tuesday’s City Council meeting.
The council voted almost unanimously (Council President Kevin Jenkins was excused) to place the measure on the Nov. 3 ballot.
Wang urged her colleagues to fast-track the measure since Oakland is currently experiencing more foreclosures than usual.
She noted that while most taxes bring in higher amounts of revenue when the economy is hot — for example, when more homes are selling, or people are buying more goods — the foreclosure tax is “counter-cyclical.”
When there’s an economic downturn, more properties go through foreclosure, and the tax is an opportunity for the city to capitalize on the spike.
She suggested the tax could dissuade lenders from foreclosing.
Wang’s proposal still exempts a number of real estate deals and entities.
Smaller banks, with under $10 billion in assets, wouldn’t have to pay the tax.
Homeowners who get foreclosed on wouldn’t either.
Companies of any size that convert office buildings into affordable housing would also be exempt.
“The intent is not to punish the individuals experiencing foreclosure,” Wang said.
“These are banks, as well as reinvestment trusts and private equity.”
The seven votes in support of Wang’s measure represented a surprising switch.
The item had failed to even make it through a committee of the council last month.
At the time, Councilmember Janani Ramachandran was especially critical of the proposal, worrying that the small bank exemption could let some predatory lenders off the hook.
On Tuesday, she offered an amendment that Wang accepted to strengthen the council’s ability to change whom the measure applies to after it passes.
Councilmember Carroll Fife, generally a vocal proponent of holding corporate housing investors accountable, said she supported the idea behind the measure but worried the process was rushed and risked losing trust from voters.
On Tuesday, she seemed reassured by the Finance Department’s confirmation of Wang’s revenue projections.
Wang had initially proposed a second ballot measure advising that the revenue from the foreclosure tax be spent on homeless shelters and addiction treatment.
But her colleagues and members of the public balked at that idea, in part because it wouldn’t be a binding requirement, and because it would have been costly and more complicated to run two measures.
Despite the measure proposal struggling in committee, the council agreed to hear the item Tuesday given the looming deadline for placing items on the November ballot.
In San Francisco, there are multiple ballot measure proposals under consideration that deal with that city’s transfer tax, including one from Mayor Daniel Lurie and a supervisor that’s similar to Wang’s in that it removes an exemption for foreclosures.
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.