Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Natalie Kerr Ph.D. results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Actor-Observer Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 222 hits. Analysis detected 1,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 5,235 authors). This Natalie Kerr Ph.D. is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Natalie Kerr Ph.D.
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Natalie Kerr Ph.D. (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,796
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Natalie Kerr Ph.D. attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Natalie Kerr Ph.D. vs sitewide
Natalie Kerr Ph.D. attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos