Author summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video910 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Cohen results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 340 hits. Analysis detected 2,168 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (4,430 of 8,435 authors). This Natalie Cohen is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Natalie Cohen
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠48%Natalie Cohen (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,640
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Natalie Cohen attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Natalie Cohen vs sitewide
Natalie Cohen attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos