Author summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nadia Knoblauch results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 377 hits. Analysis detected 3,292 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (497 of 8,366 authors). This Nadia Knoblauch is worse (more manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group.
Nadia Knoblauch
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠95%Nadia Knoblauch (selected)9%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,600
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nadia Knoblauch attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nadia Knoblauch vs sitewide
Nadia Knoblauch attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos