Author summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video748 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mitchell Armentrout results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 248 hits. Analysis detected 2,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (1,314 of 5,781 authors). This Mitchell Armentrout is worse (more manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Mitchell Armentrout
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠78%Mitchell Armentrout (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,244
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Mitchell Armentrout attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Mitchell Armentrout vs sitewide
Mitchell Armentrout attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos