Author summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video857 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Wayland results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 214 hits. Analysis detected 1,906 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,571 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (2,763 of 5,613 authors). This Michael Wayland is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Michael Wayland
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠51%Michael Wayland (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,571
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Michael Wayland attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Michael Wayland vs sitewide
Michael Wayland attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos