Author summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Booth results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 201 hits. Analysis detected 1,289 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (2,476 of 5,052 authors). This Michael Booth is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Michael Booth
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠51%Michael Booth (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,872
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Michael Booth attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Michael Booth vs sitewide
Michael Booth attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos