Author summary
⁠13%1 analyzed article/video529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melissa Hobson results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 129 hits. Analysis detected 836 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (4,747 of 8,355 authors). This Melissa Hobson is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Melissa Hobson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠44%Melissa Hobson (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,116
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Melissa Hobson attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Melissa Hobson vs sitewide
Melissa Hobson attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos