Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These McKenzie Watson-Fore results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 2.2% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 119 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,753 authors). This McKenzie Watson-Fore is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
McKenzie Watson-Fore
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠1%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%McKenzie Watson-Fore (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,240
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
McKenzie Watson-Fore attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
McKenzie Watson-Fore vs sitewide
McKenzie Watson-Fore attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos