Author summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video236 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Stone results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 609 faulty-reasoning hits from 708 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (696 of 6,540 authors). This Matt Stone is worse (more manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group.
Matt Stone
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠90%Matt Stone (selected)7%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 708
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Matt Stone attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Matt Stone vs sitewide
Matt Stone attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos