Author summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Roush results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 669 hits. Analysis detected 2,355 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,166 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (1,460 of 6,122 authors). This Matt Roush is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Matt Roush
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠77%Matt Roush (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,166
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Matt Roush attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Matt Roush vs sitewide
Matt Roush attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos