Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Marissa R. Moss results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 131 faulty-reasoning hits from 444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 9,274 authors). This Marissa R. Moss is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Marissa R. Moss
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Marissa R. Moss (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 444
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles444 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 17.6%17.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Author 17.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos