Author summary
25%2 analyzed articles/videos1,453 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Makayla Morello results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 333 hits. Analysis detected 2,371 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,812 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 28% (6,907 of 9,483 authors). This Makayla Morello is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Makayla Morello
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
28%Makayla Morello (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,812
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

27% percentile
025507510027.2% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Middle Ground: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate