Author summary
⁠7%1 analyzed article/video1,936 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lisa Shames results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 443 hits. Analysis detected 2,631 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (5,587 of 6,070 authors). This Lisa Shames is better (less manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group.
Lisa Shames
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠8%Lisa Shames (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,808
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Lisa Shames attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Lisa Shames vs sitewide
Lisa Shames attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos