Author summary
90%1 analyzed article/video856 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lila Seidman Los Angeles Times results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 246 hits. Analysis detected 1,859 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (1,929 of 5,453 authors). This Lila Seidman Los Angeles Times is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Lila Seidman Los Angeles Times
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Lila Seidman Los Angeles Times attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Lila Seidman Los Angeles Times vs sitewide
Lila Seidman Los Angeles Times attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.