Author summary
24% 1 analyzed article/video 504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Dubinsky results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Self-Serving Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 129 hits . Analysis detected 1,142 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,841 of 9,060 authors). This Lauren Dubinsky is worse (more manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. Lauren Dubinsky
Author details
Total words: 2,016
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.6% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.4% 6.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst