Author summary
66%1 analyzed article/video368 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keith Spera results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 225 hits. Analysis detected 916 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 83% (986 of 5,781 authors). This Keith Spera is worse (more manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
Keith Spera
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Keith Spera attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Keith Spera vs sitewide
Keith Spera attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.