Author summary
6%2 analyzed articles/videos3,580 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kathy Laughlin results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 817 hits. Analysis detected 4,195 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,320 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 4% (8,261 of 8,524 authors). This Kathy Laughlin is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group.
Kathy Laughlin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
4%Kathy Laughlin (selected)1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 14,320
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

3% percentile
02550751003.1% percentile
0.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate