Author summary
ā 5%1 analyzed article/video989 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Meadows results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.1% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 889 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ā 5% (7,950 of 8,367 authors). This Kate Meadows is better (less manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group.
Kate Meadows
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Hannah Martin1%
ā 0%Paul DeMark1%
ā 0%Emma Sedlak1%
ā 0%Michael Fox1%
ā 0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
ā 5%Kate Meadows (selected)2%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,956
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Kate Meadows attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Kate Meadows vs sitewide
Kate Meadows attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos