Author summary
59% 2 analyzed articles/videos 450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kane results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Self-Serving Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 183 hits . Analysis detected 1,618 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,220 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 75% (2,423 of 9,471 authors). This Kane is worse (more manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group. Kane
Author details
Total words: 2,220
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.4% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 6.6% 6.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% No True Scotsman: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst