Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Justin Mitchell results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 41 faulty-reasoning hits from 206 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 8,725 authors). This Justin Mitchell is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Justin Mitchell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Justin Mitchell (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 206
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles206 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 10.7%10.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos