Author summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video690 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julie Yang results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Hasty Generalization, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 514 hits. Analysis detected 2,530 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,760 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (2,523 of 8,287 authors). This Julie Yang is worse (more manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Julie Yang
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠70%Julie Yang (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,760
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Julie Yang attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Julie Yang vs sitewide
Julie Yang attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos