BS Summary: These Julian Chokkattu results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 629 hits. Analysis detected 4,629 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,361 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (2,506 of 4,913 authors). This Julian Chokkattu is better (less manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Julian Chokkattu
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Sophia Gates0%
⁠0%SIMRAN PARWANI0%
⁠0%SILVIA STELLACCI0%
⁠1%Sergey Radchenko0%
⁠1%Robert Lloyd0%
⁠49%Julian Chokkattu (selected)3%
⁠100%Kanoko Matsuyama54%
⁠100%Alex Horton56%
⁠100%Zahara Hill58%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt70%
⁠100%Bill Radke70%
Author details
Total words: 5,361
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Julian Chokkattu attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Julian Chokkattu vs All Other Publications
Julian Chokkattu attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.