Author summary
â 81%1 analyzed article/video364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joshua Minsoo Kim results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 42.7% saturation with 622 hits. Analysis detected 1,585 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of â 90% (889 of 8,294 authors). This Joshua Minsoo Kim is worse (more manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group.
Joshua Minsoo Kim
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Joshua Minsoo Kim attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Joshua Minsoo Kim vs sitewide
Joshua Minsoo Kim attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.