Author summary
38%3 analyzed articles/videos624 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Mayfield results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 497 hits. Analysis detected 2,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,006 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,703 of 8,822 authors). This Josh Mayfield is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Josh Mayfield
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
81%Josh Mayfield (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,006
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

81% percentile
025507510080.7% percentile
3.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.5%16.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.6%6.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.8%5.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 10.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate