Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jolena Esperto results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 94 faulty-reasoning hits from 696 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 9,120 authors). This Jolena Esperto is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jolena Esperto
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Jolena Esperto (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 696
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles696 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–10%
0.0%2%4%6%8%10%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 9.2%9.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%2%2%4%4%6%6%8%8%10%10%Indoctrination: Author 9.2%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos