Author summary
13%1 analyzed article/video1,120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JOEL THOMPSON results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 196 hits. Analysis detected 1,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 15% (8,071 of 9,487 authors). This JOEL THOMPSON is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group.
JOEL THOMPSON
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
15%JOEL THOMPSON (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,480
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

15% percentile
025507510014.9% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Personal Incredulity: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos