Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jane Vaughan results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Self-Serving Bias , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 2.9% saturation with 40 hits . Analysis detected 193 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,398 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 9,215 authors). This Jane Vaughan is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Jane Vaughan
Author details
Total words: 1,398
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst