Author summary
5%1 analyzed article/video578 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Slemenda results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Indoctrination, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 576 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,734 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,174 of 5,820 authors). This Jack Slemenda is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
Jack Slemenda
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Jack Slemenda attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Jack Slemenda vs sitewide
Jack Slemenda attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.