Author summary
⁠7%1 analyzed article/video1,016 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isabel Gil results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 221 hits. Analysis detected 1,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,048 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (5,160 of 6,470 authors). This Isabel Gil is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Isabel Gil
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠21%Isabel Gil (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,048
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Isabel Gil attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Isabel Gil vs sitewide
Isabel Gil attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos