Author summary
45%1 analyzed article/video744 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ian Sherwood results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 248 hits. Analysis detected 504 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (1,203 of 9,118 authors). This Ian Sherwood is worse (more manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Ian Sherwood
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
87%Ian Sherwood (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,488
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

87% percentile
025507510086.8% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.0%3.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 16.7%16.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 5.0%5.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.0%2.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 16.7%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos