Author summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video854 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Howard Stutz results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, In-Group Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 452 hits. Analysis detected 1,929 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (3,305 of 8,477 authors). This Howard Stutz is worse (more manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group.
Howard Stutz
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠61%Howard Stutz (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,416
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Howard Stutz attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Howard Stutz vs sitewide
Howard Stutz attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos