Author summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video415 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Helena Najar results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 741 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,245 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (2,815 of 6,365 authors). This Helena Najar is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Helena Najar
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠56%Helena Najar (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,245
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Helena Najar attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Helena Najar vs sitewide
Helena Najar attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos