Author summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video862 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Pingree results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 570 hits. Analysis detected 2,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (2,553 of 8,317 authors). This Hannah Pingree is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Hannah Pingree
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠70%Hannah Pingree (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,448
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Hannah Pingree attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Hannah Pingree vs sitewide
Hannah Pingree attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos