Author summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video4,031 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Osborne results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,441 hits. Analysis detected 8,333 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,124 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (7,458 of 8,370 authors). This Hannah Osborne is better (less manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Hannah Osborne
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠11%Hannah Osborne (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 16,124
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Hannah Osborne attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Hannah Osborne vs sitewide
Hannah Osborne attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos